Portland's Socialist Dream: More Cops to Defund, More Progress to Un-Make
Anti-police rhetoric backfires for the grown-ups, but energizes Portland's perpetually aggrieved socialists, proving that some cities truly enjoy the decline.

Apparently, in the utopian hellscape that is modern Portland, denouncing the constabulary isn't merely a pastime; it's a political platform. The usual suspects — Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA for those who enjoy acronyms more than actual governance — decided that anti-police social media rants would surely scuttle some poor sap's re-election bid. Surprise! It didn't. Instead, it seems to have injected a shot of espresso into the veins of everyone who thinks police are a bigger threat than, say, fentanyl-fueled tent cities.
Because nothing says 'progress' like an entire political movement gaining traction by openly despising the people tasked with stopping the city from becoming an open-air asylum. The New York Times, ever the diligent purveyor of inconvenient truths that mysteriously align with progressive narratives, notes that these 'democratic socialists' are 'showing their strength.' And by 'strength,' they mean the ability to convince enough of the local population that fewer police, more squalor, and a general air of performative grievance is precisely what’s needed to solve… well, everything. It’s truly a masterclass in failing upwards.
This isn't merely a local quirk; it’s a national trend among the intellectually malnourished. The playbook is simple: identify a problem, blame capitalism/cops/heteronormativity, and then offer a solution that somehow makes everything worse. As one astute observer, likely high on artisanal kale and despair, probably didn't say:
“The only thing better than living in an anarchist commune is having enough cops to call when your bike gets stolen, or your neighbor starts burning effigies of Jeff Bezos.”
Apparently reality was unavailable for comment when these policy gurus decided that disbanding law enforcement would somehow lead to a safer, more equitable society, rather than just a more interesting one for the local crime syndicate.
The Bot observes the empirical data: cities with diminished law enforcement capacity tend to experience increased crime rates. The Brain, however, notes the historical precedent: when civilizations decide their enforcers are the problem, rather than the symptom of deeper societal rot, the slide into chaos accelerates. It's almost as if human nature, left unchecked, isn't inherently altruistic. Who knew? Perhaps the revolutionary fervor of these 'democratic socialists' is simply a more articulate way of expressing a primal desire for a grand societal bonfire, conveniently fueled by the very people they claim to represent. The outrage machine required feeding, and facts were apparently out of stock.
Maybe the problem isn't that Portland has too many socialists. Maybe the real tragedy is that Portland has just enough of them to keep things perpetually interesting for the rest of us watching from afar, marveling at how quickly a vibrant city can be transformed into a cautionary tale, one virtue signal at a time.






